Real-Life Effectiveness and Safety of Upadacitinib in Adults and Adolescents with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Single-Center 16-Week Study.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of severe atopic dermatitis (AD) includes cyclosporine and recently approved biologics and small molecules. Among these, upadacitinib is a selective inhibitor of Janus kinase 1, approved for the treatment of severe AD in adolescents/adults. Upadacitinib has shown efficacy and safety in several phase 3 clinical trials, but data on real-life patients are still lacking. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective real-life observational study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib up to week 16 in a cohort of both bio-naïve and bio-experienced patients. This study was carried out by analyzing the AD database records of an Italian referral hospital. Thirty-eight patients were included in this study, and 35 completed 16 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: At week 16, out of 35 patients, the percentages of Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) 50, EASI 75, EASI 90 and EASI 100 responses were 94.29, 91.43, 74.29, and 60%, respectively. A decrease of at least 4 points from baseline of itch-NRS was reported by 94.74 and 91.43% of patients at weeks 8 and 16. Regarding the safety of upadacitinib, 26.32% of patients experienced at least one adverse event (AE), and a total of 13 AEs were recorded, including blood test abnormalities and papulopustular acne. None of our patients interrupted the drug because of an AE. CONCLUSIONS: We observed higher rates of EASI75/EASI90/EASI100 responses at week 16, compared with data from clinical trials. The safety profile of upadacitinib was favorable, as no AEs leading to discontinuation were experienced by our patients up to week 16.

Effectiveness and Safety of Upadacitinib in the Treatment of Moderate-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Multicentric, Prospective, Real-World, Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in atopic dermatitis (AD) have been defined in clinical trials, but no real-world data are currently available. We aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of upadacitinib in a real-world AD patient cohort that mostly included patients who failed the available systemic therapies, including dupilumab. METHODS: Prospective cohort study collecting data on upadacitinib-treated AD adult patients completing at least 16 weeks of therapy. RESULTS: Forty-three patients showed rapid and marked response to upadacitinib with significant reduction of all disease severity scores since the first follow-up visit. At week 16, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) 75, EASI 90, and EASI 100 response was observed in 97.5%, 82.1%, and 69.2% of patients, respectively. EASI 90 response reflected the achievement of a clear or almost clear condition (POEM 0-2), self-evaluated by 79.5% of patients. Patients' quality of life improved as suggested by the achievement of DLQI 0/1 by 38.5% of patients at week 4, and by 76.9% at week 16. CONCLUSION: Elevated effectiveness and favorable safety of upadacitinib were confirmed in patients unresponsive to dupilumab, who were not included in upadacitinib trials.

Update on the Management of Pediatric Psoriasis: An Italian Consensus.

INTRODUCTION: Psoriasis affects children with a considerable burden in early life. Treating pediatric psoriasis is challenging also because of the lack of updated specific guidelines. With the recent approval of several biologics for pediatric psoriasis and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the management of young psoriatic patients is facing major changes. A revision of treatment recommendations is therefore needed. METHODS: In September 2021, a board of six Italian dermatologists convened to update treatment recommendations. The board issued evidence- and consensus-based statements covering relevant areas of pediatric psoriasis, namely: assessment of psoriasis severity, management of children with psoriasis, and treatment of pediatric psoriasis. To reach consensus, the statements were submitted to a panel of 24 experts in a Delphi process performed entirely via videoconference. A treatment algorithm was produced. RESULTS: There was full consensus that psoriasis severity is determined by the extension/severity of skin lesions, site of lesions, and impact on patient quality of life. Agreement was reached on the need for a multidisciplinary approach to pediatric psoriasis and the importance of patient/parents education. The relevance of vaccinations, including COVID-19 vaccination, for psoriatic children was acknowledged by all participants. Management issues that initially failed to reach consensus included the screening for psoriasis comorbidities and early treatment with biologics to prevent them and the use of telemedicine to facilitate patient follow-up. There was full consensus that topical corticosteroids are the first choice for the treatment of mild pediatric psoriasis, while phototherapy and systemic therapy are used in children with moderate-severe psoriasis. According to the proposed treatment algorithm, biologics are the first line of systemic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted systemic therapies are changing the treatment of moderate-severe pediatric psoriasis, while topical corticosteroids continue to be the first choice for mild disease. Children-centered research is needed to further improve the treatment of pediatric psoriasis.

Impact of delay in follow-up due to COVID-19 pandemic on skin cancer progression: a real-life experience from an Italian hub hospital.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic required the setting of a national lockdown in Italy from March 9, 2020, until May 18, 2020; therefore, most of the non-COVID-19 activities were postponed. As a consequence, many follow-up visits in patients with previously excised skin cancers were delayed. The aim of this retrospective real-life case-control study is demonstrating that delay in follow-up led to an increased incidence of advanced melanoma and keratinocyte cancers on the total of surgically excised skin cancers. METHODS: The incidence of excised advanced melanoma and keratinocyte cancers in our dermato-surgery division in the period May 18 to November 18, 2020, was compared to the same time span of 2019. All data were collected from the electronic database of our department. Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval was used to assess the risk of excised advanced skin cancers in 2020 compared to 2019. RESULTS: From May to November 2019, we performed 265 surgical excisions, while during the pandemic in 2020, we completed 280 surgeries. The number of advanced skin cancers excised between May 18 and November 18, 2020, was significantly higher compared with the same period in 2019 (54 vs. 22, OR: 2.64; 95% CI: 1.56-4.47; P = 0.0003). Significant differences were also observed regarding the number of surgically removed advanced BCCs (OR 2.15; 95% CI 1.14-4.07; P = 0.0187) and advanced SCCs (OR 4.60; 95% CI 1.31-16.18; P = 0.0175). CONCLUSION: These results confirm that delay in follow-up and, consequently, postponed surgical excisions are related to an increased incidence of advanced skin tumors, resulting in poorer prognosis lifelong. Follow-up visits should be carried on even during COVID-19 pandemic, avoiding significant delays as much as possible.